About Deal Scores
Based on Brockmann & Company’s experience with mergers and acquisitions, we are in a strong position to voice an independent assessment of the impacts of industry impacting events.
Here are the dimensions of a deal that we will analyze:
Strategic fit [x/5]. Does the deal really make sense in terms of the strategic impacts it could make on the businesses at hand. Sometimes 1+1 does equal 3, and sometimes 1+1 does equal 1.5. High scores come from combining two incomplete product categories to form a portfolio (a la Excel, Word and PPT into Microsoft Office) or to address a new, high growth market – equipment vendor buys a hosted service provider.
Timing [x/5]. Acquisition timing is predicated on the untapped growth potential. However, buying a new company too soon means that the technology is not ripe; it is not customer validated and the risk of failure higher than than desirable. On the other hand, buying a late-stage company, hoping to generate growth from slamming together two big operations means that this ain’t a growth plan. Low marks for either of these two extremes.
Customer demand [x/5]. Where do customers fit in this project? Are they looking for solutions here?
Potential [x/5]. This is really about execution risk. How can it pay off for the participants?
Overall score is the sum of Fit, Timing, Customers and Potential.
This post has already been read 0 times!Edit